Unemployment in Bihar: The Hidden Truth Behind the Numbers

Here’s a shocking truth: Bihar’s unemployment rate has plummeted from 8% in 2017-18 to just 3% in 2023-24, and youth unemployment has seen an even more dramatic drop—from a staggering 31% in 2018-19 to 4.3% in 2022-23. But here’s where it gets controversial: these numbers aren’t telling the full story. While it’s tempting to celebrate this decline, the reality is far more complex—and, frankly, concerning. Yes, fewer people are technically unemployed, but the question remains: what kind of work are they doing? And this is the part most people miss: the jobs being created are far from ideal.

Bihar’s unemployment rates, though lower, have consistently been above the national average. Yet, the bigger issue isn’t just unemployment—it’s underemployment. Regular wage or salaried jobs, the kind that offer stability, benefits, and security, are alarmingly scarce. In fact, Bihar ranks dead last among major states in this category. Before the pandemic, only about 10% of the population held such jobs. Since then, that number has dropped even further. So, while more people are technically employed, they’re not in roles that provide a decent living.

Instead, there’s been a surge in informal, often unpaid labor, particularly within households. The category of “helpers in household enterprises”—typically family members assisting in small, unregistered businesses—has skyrocketed from 5% of the workforce in 2017-18 to 21% in 2023-24. These aren’t jobs born out of economic growth; they’re jobs born out of necessity. People are working not because they’ve found opportunities, but because they can’t afford to stop. These roles rarely come with fixed hours, fair wages, or social protection. They’re survival gigs, not career paths.

Here’s the bold truth: Bihar’s low unemployment rate is deceptive. It’s a mirage created by a shift toward informal, unregulated work. This hidden underemployment keeps the headline numbers looking good, but the reality on the ground is far bleaker. It raises a critical question: Is this the kind of progress we should be celebrating? Or is it a sign of deeper systemic issues that need addressing?

What do you think? Are these numbers a cause for optimism, or a red flag? Let’s debate this in the comments—I’m eager to hear your take.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top